158 lines
5.1 KiB
JavaScript
158 lines
5.1 KiB
JavaScript
import R from 'ramda'
|
|
import React from 'react'
|
|
import { combineReducers } from 'redux'
|
|
import reduceReducers from 'reduce-reducers'
|
|
import {reducer as formReducer, formValueSelector} from 'redux-form'
|
|
|
|
import {rules, findRuleByName } from 'Engine/rules'
|
|
import {nextSteps, makeQuestion} from 'Engine/generateQuestions'
|
|
import computeThemeColours from 'Components/themeColours'
|
|
import { STEP_ACTION, START_CONVERSATION, EXPLAIN_VARIABLE, CHANGE_THEME_COLOUR} from './actions'
|
|
|
|
import {analyseTopDown} from 'Engine/traverse'
|
|
|
|
import ReactPiwik from 'Components/Tracker';
|
|
|
|
// Our situationGate retrieves data from the "conversation" form
|
|
let fromConversation = state => name => formValueSelector('conversation')(state, name)
|
|
|
|
// assume "wraps" a given situation function with one that overrides its values with
|
|
// the given assumptions
|
|
let assume = (evaluator, assumptions) => state => name => {
|
|
let userInput = evaluator(state)(name)
|
|
return userInput != null ? userInput : assumptions[name]
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export let reduceSteps = (tracker, flatRules, answerSource) => (state, action) => {
|
|
if (![START_CONVERSATION, STEP_ACTION].includes(action.type))
|
|
return state
|
|
|
|
let rootVariable = action.type == START_CONVERSATION ? action.rootVariable : state.analysedSituation.root.name
|
|
|
|
let sim = findRuleByName(flatRules, rootVariable),
|
|
// Hard assumptions cannot be changed, they are used to specialise a simulator
|
|
// before the user sees the first question
|
|
hardAssumptions = R.pathOr({},['simulateur','hypothèses'],sim),
|
|
// Soft assumptions are revealed after the simulation ends, and can be changed
|
|
softAssumptions = R.pathOr({},['simulateur','par défaut'],sim),
|
|
intermediateSituation = assume(answerSource, hardAssumptions),
|
|
completeSituation = assume(intermediateSituation,softAssumptions)
|
|
|
|
let situationGate = completeSituation(state),
|
|
analysedSituation = analyseTopDown(flatRules,rootVariable)(situationGate)
|
|
|
|
let newState = {
|
|
...state,
|
|
analysedSituation,
|
|
situationGate: situationGate,
|
|
extraSteps: [],
|
|
explainedVariable: null
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (action.type == START_CONVERSATION) {
|
|
let next = nextSteps(situationGate, flatRules, newState.analysedSituation)
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
...newState,
|
|
foldedSteps: [],
|
|
currentQuestion: R.head(next)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (action.type == STEP_ACTION && action.name == 'fold') {
|
|
tracker.push(['trackEvent', 'answer', action.step+": "+situationGate(action.step)]);
|
|
|
|
let foldedSteps = [...state.foldedSteps, state.currentQuestion],
|
|
next = nextSteps(situationGate, flatRules, newState.analysedSituation),
|
|
assumptionsMade = !R.isEmpty(softAssumptions),
|
|
done = next.length == 0
|
|
|
|
// The simulation is "over" - except we can now fill in extra questions
|
|
// where the answers were previously given default reasonable assumptions
|
|
if (done && assumptionsMade) {
|
|
let newSituation = intermediateSituation(state),
|
|
reanalyse = analyseTopDown(flatRules,rootVariable)(newSituation),
|
|
extraSteps = nextSteps(newSituation, flatRules, reanalyse)
|
|
|
|
tracker.push(['trackEvent', 'done', 'extra questions: '+extraSteps.length]);
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
...newState,
|
|
foldedSteps,
|
|
extraSteps,
|
|
currentQuestion: null
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (done) {
|
|
tracker.push(['trackEvent', 'done', 'no more questions']);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
...newState,
|
|
foldedSteps,
|
|
currentQuestion: R.head(next)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (action.type == STEP_ACTION && action.name == 'unfold') {
|
|
tracker.push(['trackEvent', 'unfold', action.step]);
|
|
|
|
// We are possibly "refolding" a previously open question
|
|
let previous = state.currentQuestion,
|
|
// we fold it back into foldedSteps if it had been answered
|
|
answered = previous && answerSource(state)(previous) != undefined,
|
|
foldedSteps = answered ? R.concat(state.foldedSteps, [previous]) : state.foldedSteps,
|
|
// we fold it back into "extra steps" if it came from there
|
|
fromExtra = previous && softAssumptions[previous] != undefined,
|
|
extraSteps = fromExtra ? R.concat(state.extraSteps, [previous]) : state.extraSteps
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
...newState,
|
|
foldedSteps: R.without([action.step], foldedSteps),
|
|
extraSteps: R.without([action.step], extraSteps),
|
|
currentQuestion: action.step
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function themeColours(state = computeThemeColours(), {type, colour}) {
|
|
if (type == CHANGE_THEME_COLOUR)
|
|
return computeThemeColours(colour)
|
|
else return state
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function explainedVariable(state = null, {type, variableName=null}) {
|
|
switch (type) {
|
|
case EXPLAIN_VARIABLE:
|
|
return variableName
|
|
default:
|
|
return state
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
export default reduceReducers(
|
|
combineReducers({
|
|
sessionId: (id = Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000000000000) + '') => id,
|
|
// this is handled by redux-form, pas touche !
|
|
form: formReducer,
|
|
|
|
/* Have forms been filled or ignored ?
|
|
false means the user is reconsidering its previous input */
|
|
foldedSteps: (steps = []) => steps,
|
|
extraSteps: (steps = []) => steps,
|
|
currentQuestion: (state = null) => state,
|
|
|
|
analysedSituation: (state = []) => state,
|
|
|
|
situationGate: (state = name => null) => state,
|
|
refine: (state = false) => state,
|
|
|
|
themeColours,
|
|
|
|
explainedVariable
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
// cross-cutting concerns because here `state` is the whole state tree
|
|
reduceSteps(ReactPiwik, rules, fromConversation)
|
|
)
|