mirror of
https://github.com/betagouv/mon-entreprise
synced 2025-02-09 22:45:01 +00:00
On ne les prenait pas en compte lorsque l'on utilisait treatVariable D'où le gros besoin de fusionner une bonne fois pour toute treatVariable et treatRuleRoot
238 lines
7.2 KiB
JavaScript
238 lines
7.2 KiB
JavaScript
import React from 'react'
|
|
import { Trans } from 'react-i18next'
|
|
import { evaluateNode, makeJsx, rewriteNode } from './evaluation'
|
|
import { Leaf, Node } from './mecanismViews/common'
|
|
import {
|
|
disambiguateRuleReference,
|
|
findParentDependency,
|
|
findRuleByDottedName
|
|
} from './rules'
|
|
import { getSituationValue } from './variables'
|
|
|
|
export let treatVariable = (rules, rule, filter) => ({ fragments }) => {
|
|
let evaluate = (cache, situation, parsedRules, node) => {
|
|
let dottedName = node.dottedName,
|
|
// On va vérifier dans le cache courant, dict, si la variable n'a pas été déjà évaluée
|
|
// En effet, l'évaluation dans le cas d'une variable qui a une formule, est coûteuse !
|
|
cacheName = dottedName + (filter ? '.' + filter : ''),
|
|
cached = cache[cacheName]
|
|
|
|
if (cached) return cached
|
|
let variable = findRuleByDottedName(parsedRules, dottedName),
|
|
variableHasFormula = variable.formule != null,
|
|
variableHasCond =
|
|
variable['applicable si'] != null ||
|
|
variable['non applicable si'] != null ||
|
|
findParentDependency(parsedRules, variable),
|
|
situationValue = getSituationValue(situation, dottedName, variable),
|
|
needsEvaluation =
|
|
situationValue == null && (variableHasCond || variableHasFormula)
|
|
|
|
// if (dottedName.includes('jeune va')) debugger
|
|
|
|
let explanation = needsEvaluation
|
|
? evaluateNode(cache, situation, parsedRules, variable)
|
|
: variable
|
|
|
|
let cacheAndNode = (nodeValue, missingVariables) => {
|
|
cache[cacheName] = rewriteNode(
|
|
node,
|
|
nodeValue,
|
|
explanation,
|
|
missingVariables
|
|
)
|
|
return cache[cacheName]
|
|
}
|
|
const variableScore = variable.defaultValue ? 1 : 2
|
|
|
|
// SITUATION 1 : La variable est directement renseignée
|
|
if (situationValue != null) return cacheAndNode(situationValue, {})
|
|
|
|
// SITUATION 2 : La variable est calculée
|
|
if (situationValue == null && variableHasFormula)
|
|
return cacheAndNode(explanation.nodeValue, explanation.missingVariables)
|
|
|
|
// SITUATION 3 : La variable est une question sans condition dont la valeur n'a pas été renseignée
|
|
if (situationValue == null && !variableHasFormula && !variableHasCond)
|
|
return cacheAndNode(null, { [dottedName]: variableScore })
|
|
|
|
// SITUATION 4 : La variable est une question avec conditions
|
|
if (situationValue == null && !variableHasFormula && variableHasCond) {
|
|
// SITUATION 4.1 : La condition est connue et vrai
|
|
if (explanation.isApplicable)
|
|
return variable.question
|
|
? cacheAndNode(null, { [dottedName]: variableScore })
|
|
: cacheAndNode(true, {})
|
|
|
|
// SITUATION 4.2 : La condition est connue et fausse
|
|
if (explanation.isApplicable === false) return cacheAndNode(false, {})
|
|
|
|
// SITUATION 4.3 : La condition n'est pas connue
|
|
return cacheAndNode(null, explanation.missingVariables)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let variablePartialName = fragments.join(' . '),
|
|
dottedName = disambiguateRuleReference(rules, rule, variablePartialName)
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
evaluate,
|
|
//eslint-disable-next-line react/display-name
|
|
jsx: nodeValue => (
|
|
<Leaf
|
|
classes="variable filtered"
|
|
filter={filter}
|
|
name={fragments.join(' . ')}
|
|
dottedName={dottedName}
|
|
value={nodeValue}
|
|
/>
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
name: variablePartialName,
|
|
category: 'variable',
|
|
fragments,
|
|
dottedName
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This function is a wrapper that can apply :
|
|
// - temporal transformations to the value of the variable.
|
|
// See the période.yaml test suite for details
|
|
// - filters on the variable to select one part of the variable's 'composantes'
|
|
|
|
// TODO - the implementations of filters is really bad. It injects a hack in the situation to make the composante mecanism compute only one of its branch. It is then stored in the cache under a new key, dottedName.filter. This mecanism should just query the variable tree to get the active composante's value...
|
|
//
|
|
export let treatVariableTransforms = (rules, rule) => parseResult => {
|
|
let evaluateTransforms = originalEval => (
|
|
cache,
|
|
situation,
|
|
parsedRules,
|
|
node
|
|
) => {
|
|
// Filter transformation
|
|
let filteringSituation = name =>
|
|
name == 'sys.filter' ? parseResult.filter : situation(name)
|
|
let filteredNode = originalEval(
|
|
cache,
|
|
parseResult.filter ? filteringSituation : situation,
|
|
parsedRules,
|
|
node
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
let nodeValue = filteredNode.nodeValue
|
|
|
|
// Temporal transformation
|
|
let supportedPeriods = ['mois', 'année', 'flexible']
|
|
if (nodeValue == null) return filteredNode
|
|
let ruleToTransform = findRuleByDottedName(
|
|
parsedRules,
|
|
filteredNode.explanation.dottedName
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
let inlinePeriodTransform = { mensuel: 'mois', annuel: 'année' }[
|
|
parseResult.temporalTransform
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
// Exceptions
|
|
if (!rule.période && !inlinePeriodTransform) {
|
|
if (supportedPeriods.includes(ruleToTransform.période))
|
|
throw new Error(
|
|
`Attention, une variable sans période, ${
|
|
rule.dottedName
|
|
}, qui appelle une variable à période, ${
|
|
ruleToTransform.dottedName
|
|
}, c'est suspect !
|
|
|
|
Si la période de la variable appelée est neutralisée dans la formule de calcul, par exemple un montant mensuel divisé par 30 (comprendre 30 jours), utilisez "période: aucune" pour taire cette erreur et rassurer tout le monde.
|
|
`
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
return filteredNode
|
|
}
|
|
if (!ruleToTransform.période) return filteredNode
|
|
let environmentPeriod = situation('période') || 'mois'
|
|
let callingPeriod =
|
|
inlinePeriodTransform ||
|
|
(rule.période === 'flexible' ? environmentPeriod : rule.période)
|
|
let calledPeriod =
|
|
ruleToTransform.période === 'flexible'
|
|
? environmentPeriod
|
|
: ruleToTransform.période
|
|
|
|
let transformedNodeValue =
|
|
callingPeriod === 'mois' && calledPeriod === 'année'
|
|
? nodeValue / 12
|
|
: callingPeriod === 'année' && calledPeriod === 'mois'
|
|
? nodeValue * 12
|
|
: nodeValue,
|
|
periodTransform = nodeValue !== transformedNodeValue
|
|
|
|
let result = rewriteNode(
|
|
{
|
|
...filteredNode,
|
|
periodTransform: periodTransform,
|
|
...(periodTransform ? { originPeriodValue: nodeValue } : {})
|
|
},
|
|
transformedNodeValue,
|
|
filteredNode.explanation,
|
|
filteredNode.missingVariables
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
return result
|
|
}
|
|
let node = treatVariable(rules, rule, parseResult.filter)(
|
|
parseResult.variable
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
...node,
|
|
// Decorate node with the composante filter (either who is paying, either tax free)
|
|
...(parseResult.filter
|
|
? {
|
|
cotisation: {
|
|
...node.cotisation,
|
|
'dû par': parseResult.filter,
|
|
'impôt sur le revenu': parseResult.filter
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
: {}),
|
|
evaluate: evaluateTransforms(node.evaluate)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export let treatNegatedVariable = variable => {
|
|
let evaluate = (cache, situation, parsedRules, node) => {
|
|
let explanation = evaluateNode(
|
|
cache,
|
|
situation,
|
|
parsedRules,
|
|
node.explanation
|
|
),
|
|
nodeValue = explanation.nodeValue == null ? null : !explanation.nodeValue,
|
|
missingVariables = explanation.missingVariables
|
|
|
|
return rewriteNode(node, nodeValue, explanation, missingVariables)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let jsx = (nodeValue, explanation) => (
|
|
<Node
|
|
classes="inlineExpression negation"
|
|
value={nodeValue}
|
|
child={
|
|
<span className="nodeContent">
|
|
<Trans i18nKey="inlineExpressionNegation">Non</Trans>{' '}
|
|
{makeJsx(explanation)}
|
|
</span>
|
|
}
|
|
/>
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
evaluate,
|
|
jsx,
|
|
category: 'mecanism',
|
|
name: 'négation',
|
|
type: 'boolean',
|
|
explanation: variable
|
|
}
|
|
}
|